![]() ![]() ![]() I also noticed a greater swing in performance between Mullvad servers, whereas ProtonVPN servers are more consistent, even when connecting to distant servers. ProtonVPN has 1250 servers in 54 countries, while Mullvad has 770 servers in 37 countries, giving ProtonVPN the edge. With Mullvad's WireGuard connection, I averaged 200Mbps download, 17Mbps upload, with a 20ms ping time. With ProtonVPN(IKEv2), I average 120Mbps download and 17Mbps upload, with a 43ms ping time. The next big difference between the two is the connection speed, and this is where the difference between WireGuard and IKEv2 comes into play. It looks as tho almost no time or effort went into the app. While the ProtonVPN app is robust, and well-designed, the Mullvad app is bare-bones both in terms of design, and configuration options. The first big difference is the apps that each provider uses. So, I purchased a 30-day subscription from Mullvad VPN, and connected my Samsung Note 10+. I've been wanting to test-run a WireGuard VPN, to compare to ProtonVPN's IKEv2 connection. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |